“Sure, my boss took advantage of me, but I will always remain firm on this point: it was a consensual relationship,” she composed. “Any ‘abuse’ came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position.”
Reflecting on those words in a 2018 Vanity Fair piece, “I now see how bothersome it was that the 2 people even got to a location where there was a concern of approval. Instead, the roadway that led there was cluttered with unsuitable abuse of authority, station, and advantage. (Full stop.)
“Now, at 44, I’m beginning (just beginning) to consider the implications of the power differentials that were so vast between a president and a White House intern. I’m beginning to entertain the notion that in such a circumstance the idea of consent might well be rendered moot.”
She did not, nevertheless, disavow her own firm, keeping that in her decision-making minutes, she desired what took place sexually in between her and Clinton to take place. It’s simply that the truth that it took place at all was likewise proof of the olden disparity in between what’s right and what’s so regrettably typical.
So, take all of that– the abuse of power, the betrayal, the scapegoating, the gaslighting, the embarrassment and mental abuse, the media hysteria and, yes, the 2 short articles of impeachment submitted versus President William Jefferson Clinton– and you have actually got an American criminal activity story.
