Alabama isn’t retaining monitor of the variety of felons who’ve registered to vote following the implementation of the Definition of Ethical Turpitude Act, in line with a spokesperson for the Alabama Secretary of State’s workplace.
“The explanation that there’s not [an official record] is as a result of the state doesn’t monitor felon knowledge within the Secretary of State’s Workplace. Data is delivered on an as-needed foundation to the county registrars when reviewing every registrant,” a spokesperson informed BuzzFeed Information.
Alabama’s current transfer, together with former Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe’s resolution to revive voting rights individually to greater than 200,000 convicted felons, got here amid some main modifications in the best way some view prison justice coverage in American politics. A rising and bipartisan group of individuals have usually supported a mixture of altering sentencing legal guidelines, particularly round nonviolent drug offenses, and reexamining the best way prisons are administered, with some additionally calling for the restoration of voting rights.
However one political query that is still unanswered is, what number of felons whose capacity to vote is restored really do vote?
The Sentencing Challenge estimates that in 2016, 286,266 folks had been topic to legal guidelines that bar felons from voting in Alabama, whereas the Southern Poverty Legislation Middle speculated that just about 250,000 folks in Alabama regained the best to vote after Republican Gov. Kay Ivey signed the Definition of Ethical Turpitude Act into legislation.
The act gained nationwide consideration after Democratic Sen. Doug Jones’ shocking and slim win in December; Kenneth Glasgow, a grassroots activists in Alabama, claimed to have helped hundreds of felons navigate the method of registering to vote.
The legislation clearly defines the kinds of “crimes of ethical turpitude,” because it’s utilized in a part of the state’s structure to bar folks sure criminals from registering to vote. Earlier than the Ethical Turpitude Act went into impact in August, the kinds of crimes within the “ethical turpitude” class had been left to the discretion of county election officers.
The implementation of the legislation first bumped into points when county registrars stated they had been confused about how the legislation ought to be applied and the way it utilized to their duties, in line with a report from AL.com.