Iraqi political and militia leaders condemned U.S. President Donald Trump‘s shock go to to U.S. troops in Iraq on Wednesday as a violation of Iraq’s sovereignty, and lawmakers mentioned a gathering between Trump and Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi was canceled as a consequence of a disagreement over venue.
Sabah al Saadi, the chief of the Islah parliamentary bloc, known as for an emergency session of parliament “to debate this blatant violation of Iraq’s sovereignty and to cease these aggressive actions by Trump who ought to know his limits: The U.S. occupation of Iraq is over.”
The Bina bloc, Islah’s rival in parliament and led by Iran-backed militia chief Hadi al-Amiri, additionally objected to Trump’s journey to Iraq.
READ MORE: Trump makes shock go to to Iraq, stands agency on Syria pullout
“Trump’s go to is a flagrant and clear violation of diplomatic norms and exhibits his disdain and hostility in his dealings with the Iraqi authorities,” mentioned a press release from Bina.
Abdul Mahdi’s workplace mentioned in a press release that U.S. authorities had knowledgeable Iraq’s management of the president’s go to forward of time. The assertion mentioned the Iraqi prime minister and U.S. president talked by phone as a consequence of a “disagreement over conduct the assembly.”
Iraqi lawmakers instructed Reuters that the pair had disagreed over the place their deliberate assembly ought to happen: Trump had requested to satisfy on the Ain al-Asad navy base, a suggestion which Abdul Mahdi declined.
WATCH: Trump tells troops in Iraq IS ‘not so dominant anymore’
Trump’s go to comes amid a backdrop of escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran, as Washington seeks to counter Iran’s sway within the Center East. The formation of Iraq’s authorities has stalled as effectively amid intensifying discord between the Islah and Bina blocs.
Falih Khazali, a former militia chief turned politician allied with Bina, accused the USA of wanting to extend its presence in Iraq. “The American management was defeated in Iraq and needs to return once more underneath any pretext, and that is what we’ll by no means permit,” he mentioned.
Bina mentioned Trump’s go to “locations many query marks on the character of the U.S. navy presence and its actual aims, and what these aims may pose to the safety of Iraq.”
WATCH: Trump defends Syria withdrawal throughout shock go to to troops in Iraq
Whereas there was no full-scale violence in Iraq since Islamic State suffered a sequence of defeats final 12 months, some 5,200 U.S. troops prepare and advise Iraqi forces nonetheless waging a marketing campaign in opposition to the militant group.
Islah is headed by populist Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. Sadr has lengthy opposed the U.S. presence in Iraq because the U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003. He led two uprisings in opposition to U.S. forces in Iraq and is among the few Shi’ite leaders to additionally distance himself from Iran.
Iraq’s Shi’ite militias, also referred to as the PMF, a lot of that are supported by Iran, oppose the presence of U.S. troops within the area. The PMF was made formally a part of the safety forces this 12 months after serving to the navy defeat Islamic State in Iraq in 2017.
WATCH: Trump says he was involved about security of Melania and workers throughout flight to Iraq
Qais al-Khazali, the chief of the highly effective Iran-backed Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia mentioned on Twitter, “Iraqis will reply with a parliamentary choice to oust your (U.S.) navy forces. And if they don’t go away, we now have the expertise and the power to take away them by different implies that your forces are conversant in.”
Some Iraqis, nevertheless, had been much less involved with the U.S. president’s go to.
“We gained’t get something from America,” mentioned Baghdad resident Mohammad Abdullah. “They’ve been in Iraq 16 years, they usually haven’t given something to the nation besides destruction and devastation.”