EU’s vaccine export controls might harm international vaccine supply

EU's vaccine export controls could damage global vaccine supply

Revealed: The Secrets our Clients Used to Earn $3 Billion

The EU’s choice to carry out export controls on coronavirus vaccines is “highly problematic,” according to professionals, who alerted that it might result in a collapse in the international supply if other nations did the same.

“There’s a real risk that the EU taking this decision is going to spark a cascade in other countries putting in place (vaccine) export bans,” Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health Centre Graduate Institute in Geneva, informed CNBC on Monday.

“There’s a real risk that we’re going to see a breakdown in the movement of vaccines across borders, the same kind of breakdown we saw a year ago when countries, including the EU, blocked food and even masks and other essential medical supplies from being exported. This is disastrous at an international level.”

At worst, she stated, “the biggest risk is that this is going to set an example that many other countries will follow, and this will lead to a collapse in global vaccine supply.”

Export controls

People line to get the Chinese-made Sinopharm Covid-19 vaccine, outside the Belgrade Fair developed into a vaccination centre, on January 25, 2021.


Despite firmly insisting that the step was not an “export ban,” it however enables member states to limit exports of coronavirus vaccines that are made in the bloc if they consider that the vaccine maker has actually not honored existing agreements with the EU.

It includes exemptions for a range of nations outside the EU however within Europe, such as Albania and Serbia, a series of nations in northern Africa and any of the 92 low- and middle-income nations covered by the COVAX effort.

Moon stated that: “The EU has certainly put in place a few pressure valves to allow for exports to certain countries in the world, but there’s still a lot of countries who heavily rely on EU production and they’re going to be hurt quite badly.”

The bloc made the statement in the middle of increased issues and unsightly public conflicts with vaccine makers over an absence of materials to the bloc.

Vaccine maker Pfizer stated it was briefly decreasing the production of its shot, established with German biotech BioNTech, as it upgrades production centers in Belgium, while AstraZeneca likewise dealt a blow to the EU by revealing it would provide far less vaccine dosages than at first anticipated in the very first quarter, pointing out issues at its Dutch and Belgian plants.

The hold-ups stacked more pressure on the European Commission, which was currently being slammed for its absence of speed in buying and authorizing vaccines, and its rollout of immunizations.

The relocate to present controls on exports activated a furor with the U.K. in specific, after a week of simmering stress over materials of the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is likewise made at 2 websites in Britain.

The EU had actually shown that materials must be diverted to Europe from the British plants, triggering a disagreement with the drugmaker and the U.K. federal government. It intensified to the point where the EU stated it would bypass part of the Brexit handle order to avoid EU-made vaccines possibly getting in the U.K. through Northern Ireland.

It reversed that choice quickly later on following a public protest, consisting of from the World Health Organization, which alerted versus the hazards of “vaccine nationalism.” The ¬†EU guaranteed the U.K. that it would get vaccine materials made in the bloc.

Pandora’s box

Simon J. Evenett, a teacher of worldwide trade and financial advancement at the University of St. Gallen, commented Monday that the EU’s relocation amounted opening “Pandora’s box” which it might have unexpected conseqences.

He stated the limitations might trigger issue amongst foreign federal governments for a variety of factors, consisting of the truth that the “standard for authorizing exports of Covid-19 vaccine is unclear,” which these choices “may be arbitrary.” He likewise flagged that it might not lapse on March 31 2021, as guaranteed.

Evenett alerted that the relocation could, “spread along the Covid-19 vaccine supply chain, to include vital ingredients need to produce the vaccines and to distribute them,” and might even result in export curbs on other vital products such as food, energy and other medications.

Staff at CSL are operating in the laboratory on November 08, 2020 in Melbourne, Australia, where they will start producing AstraZeneca-Oxford University COVID-19 vaccine.

Darrian Traynor | Getty Images

Such situations “would compound the harm done to both the EU’s public health systems and to its multinationals,” he stated.

“Disruption in vaccine supply chains will slow down rates of inoculation in the EU and elsewhere resulting in unnecessary deaths and an even slower economic recovery. If the European Commission realises that it is about to open Pandora’s Box, then it may find an elegant way to withdraw its export control regime on Covid-19 regime,” he stated.

“Doing so would enable to the EU to reclaim its reputation as a defender of multilateralism and the rules-based global trading system. This morning that reputation is in tatters.”