Google has been accused in a lawsuit of illegally monitoring the actions of thousands and thousands of iPhone and Android telephone customers even once they use a privateness setting to forestall it.
Based on a grievance filed late Friday, Google falsely assures folks they gained’t be tracked in the event that they flip the “Location Historical past” characteristic on their telephones to “off,” and as an alternative violates their privateness by monitoring and storing their actions.
READ MORE: Google admits it might observe your location even if you happen to disable the setting
“Google represented consumer ‘can flip off Location Historical past at any time. With Location Historical past off, the locations you go are not saved.’ This merely was not true,” the grievance filed in San Francisco federal court docket stated.
The plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil of San Diego, is looking for class-action standing on behalf of U.S. customers of Android telephones and Apple iPhones who turned the monitoring characteristic off.
WATCH: Ought to the federal government intervene with Google’s privateness points?
He’s looking for unspecified damages for Google’s alleged intentional violations of California privateness legal guidelines, and intrusion into folks’s non-public affairs.
The alleged monitoring by the unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet Inc was described in an Aug. 13 Related Press article, which stated it was confirmed by pc science researchers at Princeton College.
READ MORE: Google tracks your actions in your telephone, even if you happen to inform it to not
Google didn’t instantly reply on Monday to requests for remark. Michael Sobol, a companion at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein representing Patacsil, didn’t instantly reply to comparable requests.
Patacsil claimed that Google illegally tracked him on his Android telephone and in a while his iPhone, the place he had downloaded some Google apps.
WATCH: That is what Google is aware of about you – and what it means to your security
He stated Google’s “principal aim” was to “surreptitiously monitor” telephone customers and let third events do the identical.
The assistance part of Google’s web site now says that turning Location Historical past off “doesn’t have an effect on different location companies” in telephones, and that some location knowledge could also be saved via different companies, equivalent to Search and Maps.
The case is Patacsil v Google Inc, U.S. District Court docket, Northern District of California, No. 18-05062.