A decide in New York on Friday determined to delay the sexual assault trial of disgraced film mogul Harvey Weinstein till Sept. 9.
Decide James Burke introduced the delay following a closed-door listening to, at which prosecutors sought to persuade the decide that girls be allowed to testify who’ve accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct, however whose claims haven’t led to felony fees.
JUDGE RULES KEY HARVEY WEINSTEIN HEARING WILL BE HELD IN SECRET, AWAY FROM THE PRESS
Weinstein’s trial had been scheduled to start June three, however each side indicated they want extra time to kind by means of witness and proof points. Jury choice is anticipated to take as much as two weeks, with testimony lasting a few month.
“We had an excellent day in courtroom in the present day. We’re glad that the trial acquired again to September,” Weinstein legal professional Jose Baez instructed reporters. “That is going to provide us an ample alternative to dig into the case.”
Weinstein, 67, is charged with raping an unidentified feminine acquaintance in his Manhattan lodge room in 2013 and performing a forcible intercourse act on a distinct girl in 2006. He has denied all allegations of wrongdoing. He pleaded not responsible and is free on $1 million bail.
Weinstein himself was mum as he got here and went from courtroom Friday. Requested how he was doing, he simply nodded.
Burke mentioned closing the courtroom for the listening to was “the one means accessible to keep away from the tainting of the jury pool” as a result of the continuing handled materials that “is prejudicial to the defendant and is very inflammatory.”
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, ASHLEY JUDD SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE POSTPONED
Information protection, he mentioned, would serve no goal apart from to stir damaging public sentiment towards Weinstein
Legal professionals for information organizations, together with The Related Press, argued that the prosecution and protection arguments did not meet the excessive authorized commonplace for banning the media and the general public.
Weinstein’s case is “a matter of immense and legit public curiosity,” and the allegations in opposition to him are already extensively identified, mentioned Robert Balin, a lawyer for the information organizations.
Prosecutors mentioned it was essential to shut the courtroom, each to guard Weinstein’s proper to a good trial and to protect the identities of accusers whose names and allegations have been anticipated to come back up in the course of the listening to.
Weinstein lawyer Marianne Bertuna argued that information protection may affect potential jurors and that “the courtroom can’t be complicit with the press in denying the defendant’s proper to a good trial.”
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP
Balin mentioned that the allegations in opposition to Weinstein from greater than 80 girls have already been extensively reported and that lots of them, similar to actresses Mira Sorvino and Ashley Judd, have agreed to be recognized publicly. However not all have, Illuzzi-Orbon mentioned.
An appellate decide denied a request by the media shops to right away halt the continuing however granted an expedited attraction and ordered events to file briefs by Wednesday. The information organizations need entry to a transcript of the listening to and to associated paperwork that have been filed underneath seal.
Fox Information’ Lissa Kaplan and The Related Press contributed to this report.