San Francisco – Susan Fowler was, she recalls, “over the moon” in January 2016.
At 24, she had snagged her dream job as a site reliability engineer at Uber, which had recruited her by saying the ride-hailing company was a “super-women-friendly” place to work, boasting 25 per cent female engineers.
And she had her first date with the man who would become her husband, Chad Rigetti, who runs a quantum computing startup in Berkeley and who, she says, is as “beautiful” as Michael Fassbender.
After a movie, she opened up her Uber app to get a ride home.
“No, no, no,” Rigetti told her. “I don’t use Uber.”
“What?” Fowler replied, thinking he was joking. “But I work there.”
“I only use Lyft,” he said. “Did you read that interview with the CEO, Travis, where he talked about how Uber helps him get girls? He’s a misogynist. I could never use his product.”
Fowler smiles ruefully at the memory during her first interview since she became instantly famous.
It’s startling to think that this is the woman who pierced the self-indulgent, adolescent Pleasure Island mentality of Silicon Valley, causing the stunning downfall of Travis “we call that ‘Boob-er'” Kalanick and starting a bonfire on creepy sexual behaviour in Silicon Valley that spread to Hollywood and engulfed Harvey Weinstein and Amazon’s Roy Price.
Dressed in black jeans, brown loafers, a denim jacket – “the only clothes I can fit into” – and wearing a Fitbit with a hot pink band that cost her $1 on Amazon, Fowler is 26 and seven months’ pregnant. She looks so young that people give her “weird looks,” she says, worried that she will be a teenage mother.
She is petite, with an angelic smile and an air of innocence that belies a fierce will. Her Instagram account features a picture of Charlie Brown saying, “Be the best you can be”; a coffee mug with the motto from Apollo 13, “Failure is not an option”; and books she is reading on a wide array of subjects, including ants. She describes herself as “an amateur myrmecologist.”
As Kara Swisher wrote in Recode, Fowler did everyone in tech a favor by unmasking the donkeys “worshipped as kings” by the venture capitalists and investors and boards and even the media, felling them with one “epic” 2900-word blog post “about what happens when a hot company becomes hostage to its increasingly dysfunctional and toxic behaviours.”
If what people know you for is bringing light to an issue about bad behaviour, about bad stuff going on and laws not being followed and people being treated inappropriately, why wouldn’t I want that? That’s a badge of honour
No doubt when Kalanick met the wide-eyed Fowler at the office Christmas party soon after she started, it never entered his head that she would become the disciplinarian who effectively confiscated his car keys for reckless driving with one blog post. Yet it was a role Fowler had been preparing for her whole life. The Peter Pan libertines met their match in a sweet Stoic.
The philosophy that changed her life
She read Plutarch’s Lives. “The Stoics were really what changed me,” she says. “Because their whole thing was about, ‘You don’t have control over a lot of the things that determine your life, so all you can do is focus on becoming the best person that you can be.’ And that really spoke to me because I did feel, especially during my teenage years, that my life was really out of my control. I really wished that I could just learn and do all the fun things and cool extracurriculars that I thought everybody else my age was doing.”
Fowler was a stable hand and a nanny to help support her family. “And I would tell myself, in the times when I would be really, really sad, ‘Once I get out of here, I’m going to do something great.’ And I would just pray at night, like, ‘God, please just let me get out, give me opportunities to get out. I promise I’ll do good with it.'”
The essay that shook Silicon Valley was called Reflecting on One Very, Very Strange Year at Uber, and Fowler began by noting that it was “a strange, fascinating, and slightly horrifying story.” Published on February 19, it rocked the world’s most valuable startup, challenging the mantra that great disrupters are above the law. The post was notable for its tone, as the young engineer who had left the company after a year walked the reader through everything that had gone very wrong in the brozilla culture of kegs, sexual coarseness and snaky competition.
Fowler was on her first day with her new engineering team when her manager sent her a string of messages over the company chat system.
“He’s telling me that he’s in an open relationship and that his girlfriend is getting laid all the time, but he just can’t because he’s at work all the time,” she says, reprising her blog post with me. “And he’s trying really hard not to get in trouble at work, but he’s really looking for a woman to have sex with. And I was like, ‘What the hell? This can’t be real. How stupid does he have to be?’ But it turned out he’d been getting away with this for so long, he didn’t care anymore. And I feel like so many of these men, they believe that the only reason women get into these jobs is to get a guy.”
Fowler took screen shots and reported the manager to human resources, thinking, “They’ll do the right thing.” But they didn’t, explaining that the manager was “a high performer” and it was his first offence, something Fowler later found to be untrue.
“Somehow I’m supposed to be like, ‘Oh, he’s a high performer? Never mind. How dare I?'” she says, laughing.
She wrote that HR told her she could either find another team to work on or stay on that man’s team and expect a poor performance review. Another manager told her that if she reported stuff to HR, he could fire her. Amid the manic, sexist behaviour, the number of female engineers in the division Fowler was part of dwindled to less than 6 per cent – too few, the company said, to merit ordering them the same black leather jackets they were ordering for the men.
When Fowler earned some money from Production-Ready Microservices, a book on engineering she wrote, she went out to Madewell and bought herself a black leather jacket.
“I didn’t really care if they branded me a troublemaker,” she says, “because I hadn’t gotten that far in my life and overcome all these things to get treated inappropriately. I wasn’t going to take it. I’d worked so hard. I deserved so much better. And I was, like, ‘No. That’s not OK. You don’t get to do that.'”
‘A badge of honour’
In her memo, she says, “I knew I had to be super-careful about how I said it if I wanted anybody to take it seriously. A lot of women have been whistleblowers in the past, and a lot of them have just gotten torn down and treated terribly. “One of the things that kept popping up was this idea that if you do whistleblow about sexual harassment, then that is what will define the rest of your life. And I kind of struggled with this.
“But then, to me, I realised, you know what? No. Stepping back, just being in my little Stoicism Susan bubble, if what people know you for is bringing light to an issue about bad behaviour, about bad stuff going on and laws not being followed and people being treated inappropriately, why wouldn’t I want that? That’s a badge of honour.
“And I wasn’t just standing up for myself. I felt like I was standing up for everyone else that I was seeing at Uber who was mistreated. It was an extremely demoralising environment. I would see people who would get harassed or made fun of or bullied, and they would go report it, and they would just get ground down by upper management and HR. And so I felt like, if I can take this on despite the consequences, then I should do it.”
Like women in Hollywood I talked to after the Weinstein collapse, Fowler thought the new outspokenness in Silicon Valley on sexual harassment may have been spurred by the election of President Donald Trump.
“The second Trump won, I felt super-powerless, and I thought, ‘Oh my God, no one’s looking out for us,'” she says. “They have the House, they have the Senate, they have the White House. And so we have to take it back ourselves. We have to be the ones doing the work.”
The only woman on the board then, Arianna Huffington, who had vowed that the culture of “brilliant jerks” must end, had been trying to help Kalanick by advising him to sleep more and meditate. But he caused another kerfuffle when he chose to meditate in the lactation room.
When Fowler’s memo gained exposure, Huffington oversaw the investigation by Eric Holder, talked to employees, and said she wanted to “hold the leadership team’s feet to the fire.” Uber later fired 20 people, including senior executives.
“So I was disappointed in her because I expected her to be an advocate,” Fowler says, noting that Huffington appeared on TV after the blog post to insist that there’s no “systemic problem” at Uber.
“I had two friends who went to her and Liane Hornsey, who’s the head of HR, and reported various harassment discrimination,” Fowler says. “And then I was told that many other women were doing the same thing. And then Arianna went on TV that same week and said, there’s no ‘systemic problem.’ Which I was like, ‘No, a whole bunch of people just went to you this week.'” Fowler adds that the company’s chief technology officer, Thuan Pham, who knew about her complaints, is still in the same job.
Huffington told me that she agreed that the problem was “systemic sexism” but that she did not believe there was “systemic sexual harassment.” But, she added, “there should be zero tolerance for even one case of sexual harassment.”
Speaking to The Wall Street Journal this month, Hornsey, who joined Uber a month after Fowler left and a month before the blog post, was asked if she had ever reached out to Fowler. “I have said, very publicly, ‘Thank you’ to her because she raised some stuff that did lead to change,” she said. “I don’t know whether there would be any benefit in meeting her. I’m seriously working for my employees today; she’s an ex-employee.”
Fowler tweeted a screen shot of that part of the interview, saying: “Oooh burn” and “She really, really doesn’t like me.”
On the advice of a friend, Fowler got private security for the first few weeks after she published her incendiary essay.
She thinks Silicon Valley needs to get rid of forced arbitration: “When you join these companies, they make you sign away your constitutional right to sue.”
Fowler has taken that to the Supreme Court, and as is her wont, is studying the syllabuses of Columbia Law School so she can learn more about her rights.
She is the editor of a tech publication for Stripe, and she’s working with Verve, a talent agency, developing a movie based on her experiences. The agency described them as “Erin Brockovich” meets “The Social Network.”
And yet Fowler is still reading the Stoics (while Kalanick is still wrestling with the board about who should control the company he started). “I think, right now especially, with Trump in the White House, who knows what’s going on with North Korea? Then we have natural disasters happening. If just feels like you’re being tossed around on the ocean and there’s nothing. What I keep going back to and what keeps me going, is trying to do good in whatever little spot of the world we can influence, no matter how small.”
As we leave, I ask Fowler if she’s knows the baby’s sex.
“A girl,” she says, smiling radiantly. “I’m so excited. Now I’m just like, ‘Got to make this world better so she doesn’t have to deal with these things.'”
New York Times