Debra Sweet, holds up an indication as she joins folks gathered for a reproductive rights rally at Brooklyn Borough Hall on September 01, 2021 in Downtown Brooklyn in New York City.
Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images
The Department of Justice on Thursday sued Texas over its restrictive new abortion legislation, saying the state’s legislature enacted the statute “in open defiance of the Constitution.”
The lawsuit comes after the Supreme Court, stacked 6-Three with conservative justices, final week refused to dam the controversial abortion legislation, which bans nearly all abortions after as early as six weeks of being pregnant, from taking impact.
President Joe Biden had blasted the excessive courtroom’s in a single day ruling, saying it “insults the rule of law.” Attorney General Merrick Garland stated on the time that the Justice Department was “evaluating all options to protect the constitutional rights of women, including access to an abortion.”
Garland introduced the civil lawsuit towards Texas throughout a Three p.m. ET press convention.
“The act is clearly unconstitutional,” Garland stated.
The 30-page criticism towards the Lone Star State, filed in federal courtroom in Austin, additionally accuses Texas of adopting “an unprecedented scheme” to insulate the abortion legislation from authorized challenges by empowering personal residents to “serve as bounty hunters” towards those that seeks out or assists in acquiring abortions.
The authorities is asking the courtroom to declare the abortion legislation “invalid, null, and void,” and bar Texas from implementing it in any method.
“This kind of scheme to nullify the Constitution of the United States is one that all Americans, whatever their politics or party, should fear,” Garland stated Thursday. “If it prevails, it may become a model for action in other areas, by other states and with respect to other constitutional rights and judicial precedents.”
“Nor need one think long or hard to realize the damage that would be done to our society if states were allowed to implement laws that empower any private individual to infringe on another’s constitutionally protected rights in this way,” the U.S. lawyer normal stated.
The legislation, which was signed into legislation in May by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, prohibits abortion after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, which often happens across the sixth week of being pregnant. At that point, many ladies are nonetheless not conscious that they’ve turn out to be pregnant.
The laws, S.B. 8, consists of an exception for medical emergencies, however not for pregnancies ensuing from rape or incest. Abbott this week defended the legislation, and stated his purpose is to “eliminate rape so that no woman, no person, will be a victim of rape.”
Attorney General Merrick Garland proclaims a lawsuit to dam the enforcement of recent Texas legislation that bans most abortions on the Justice Department in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 9, 2021.
J. Scott Applewhite | AP
Rather than put public officers or legislation enforcement in command of implementing the ban, the legislation empowers personal residents to file civil lawsuits towards abortion suppliers or anybody who “aids or abets” in an abortion after the six-week threshold. Those lawsuits can yield at the least $10,000 in “statutory damages” per abortion.
Critics say these guidelines successfully set up a bounty system so as to sidestep the abortion rights enshrined within the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade.
But the Supreme Court, in a 5-Four ruling, denied an emergency request from abortion-rights advocates for a short lived injunction to cease the abortion legislation from taking impact on Sept. 1.
The majority, which included all three justices appointed by former President Donald Trump, wrote in a one-paragraph ruling that the petitioners had “not carried their burden” on complicated procedural questions raised within the case.
But they famous that “this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent that Texas had successfully “deputized the State’s citizens as bounty hunters, offering them cash prizes for civilly prosecuting their neighbors’ medical procedures.”
Planned Parenthood, one of many teams that petitioned the Supreme Court to dam S.B. 8, applauded the Biden administration for submitting the civil lawsuit.
“Right now patients across Texas are scared, they are confused, and they are being left with nowhere to turn to access safe, legal abortion,” Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson stated in a press release.
“We hope this important next step by the Biden administration will help restore Texans’ Â access to the health care they need,” Johnson stated.
This is breaking information. Please test again for updates.
