Maggie Gyllenhaal was not happy with a author’s characterization of her voice within the opening of a latest interview she did with him.
The 41-year-old star took to Twitter on Thursday to scold a author for his feedback about her voice and the way its excessive, “cartoonish” high quality could make it tough to hearken to her focus on severe subjects.
MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL SAYS SHE TOOK JAMES FRANCO’S SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS SERIOUSLY WHILE FILMING ‘THE DEUCE’
“To author @PatrickHJSmith After all you’re free to assume something you want in regards to the “silliness” of my voice and my face. However once you open your piece in @impartial commenting on that, it serves to undermine every part we spoke about,” the “The Duce” star wrote.
The Unbiased article in query opens with author Patrick Smith discussing the “flaw in our tradition” that makes folks assume severe subjects must be mentioned in sure literal tones.
“Speaking to Maggie Gyllenhaal generally is a little disorienting. She has a high-pitched, cartoonish voice, which she makes use of to specific deep issues. One critic memorably mentioned that she possessed a ‘Kewpie-doll silliness,’ however possibly it’s a flaw in our tradition that we count on severe ideas to be couched in sonorous tones,” he writes.
The author was fast to answer Gyllenhaal’s criticism of his work on Twitter.
MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL REGRETS SEPT. 11 COMMENT
“I apologise if that’s the way it got here throughout. The quote you’re referring to was from one other author. I needed to focus on it as an eg of the best way you’ve got been underestimated for superficial, gendered causes,” He wrote. “I believe you and your work are sensible, which I attempted to make obvious.”
Within the article, the star talks in regards to the tough highway ladies have to seek out female roles in Hollywood noting that “we dwell in a masculine world.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“It’s not inconceivable, and it actually occurs,” she mentioned of femininity in artwork, “however I believe simply because one thing is written by a lady, or directed by a lady, that doesn’t essentially make it female – as a result of the context that we’re in is essentially masculine.”