Okay, we all know the struggles of going via college and generally we might not utterly agree with our lecturers particularly in terms of our grades. Nevertheless, this masters scholar from Monash College Australia undoubtedly took issues to the acute if you happen to ask us!
In response to the Newshub, a journalism masters scholar, Chinmay Naik submitted an task concerning the damaging stereotypes of canine and was shocked when he found that he was marked 12/100 for it. His task was graded a second time, however there was solely a slight enhance in his marks.
The task featured road interviews with canine house owners strolling their pets, and was criticised by the markers for not having a story construction, one shot of overlay, no skilled interviews, and no clear starting/center/finish. Wah, was it actually that dangerous?
Chinmay didn’t settle for the outcome and thought he deserved at the least a minimal passing mark. So, he determined to take issues to the Supreme Courtroom to get his marks overturned, based on the Day by day Mail.
The masters scholar clarified in court docket that the college acted unlawfully for not disclosing who the second marker was, and believes the identical particular person marked his task twice.
The case was additionally taken to the Australian Prime Minister’s workplace, the Human Rights Fee and even public advocates, who all rejected Chinmay’s enchantment.
When you thought you had been unfairly graded in an task, would you go to such lengths to get a greater grade? Tell us within the feedback under!
Additionally learn: Some College students Wrongly Answered English SPM Paper, Dad or mum Blames ‘Error’ in Query