New York Times slammed for article saying women over 30 should wear sweats, not ‘sexy’ yoga pants


Buy Organic Traffic | Cheap Organic Traffic | Increase Organic Traffic | Organic Traffic

A New York Occasions opinion piece is being ridiculed for calling yoga pants “dangerous for ladies,” and suggesting that girls over 30 ought to put on sweatpants as a substitute.

The article, revealed below the byline Honor Jones, claims that girls “aren’t sporting [yoga pants] as a result of they’re cooler or extra comfy” than sweatpants, however “as a result of they’re horny.”

“You suppose the promoting level of Lululemon’s Reveal Tight Precision pants is de facto the best way their moth-eaten design offers a ‘much-needed dose of airflow’?” asks Jones, earlier than declaring that girls are solely “sporting them as a result of they’re horny.”

The creator goes on to name out the athleisure trade, and the rise in recognition of studio health lessons, for getting People to spend a reported $46 billion on activewear in 2016.


“Frankly, I’m irritated by the entire booming trade round ladies’s train, which is probably most evident within the rise of studio lessons. In accordance with the Affiliation of Health Studios, People spent round $24 billion on studio charges in 2015, or about $four billion greater than they spent on conventional gyms — and that unfold has solely elevated since then. Naturally, ladies are spending probably the most; they outnumber males in studio lessons by greater than two to 1,” says Jones, who argued that costly studio lessons and costly athletic clothes go hand-in-hand.

The article lastly finishes with the creator’s primary level: Sweatpants ought to be on the forefront of all gym-goers wardrobes, as a substitute of tight-fitting pants that “threaten to indicate each dimple and roll in each girl over 30.”

For the reason that article’s publication, ladies have taken to social media to name Jones out for “body-shaming.”


One consumer wrote, “Okay @nytimes. 1) I’m certain you had your choose of considerate opinion items for this Sunday’s version…and this was your alternative? 2) Girls writing op-eds about different ladies’s sartorial selections is dangerous for ladies three) You possibly can have my yoga pants while you pry them from my chilly useless booty.”

“The New York Occasions is seemingly in opposition to ladies sporting yoga pants,” one other consumer wrote. “Being in opposition to yoga pants is without doubt one of the most absurd opinions I’ve ever heard.”

Whereas one merely tweeted, “As an alternative of studying the New York Occasions yoga piece, attempt doing actually anything.”

Buy Website Traffic | Cheap Website Traffic | Increase Website Traffic | Website Traffic

Source link