The media’s protection of President Trump has been overwhelmingly damaging, greater than thrice extra important than the preliminary protection of former President Barack Obama and twice that of former Presidents George W. Bush and Invoice Clinton.
The Pew Analysis Heart mentioned that the early protection of Trump was 62 % damaging. By comparability, Obama’s protection was simply 20 % damaging.
“About six-in-ten tales on Trump’s early days in workplace had a damaging evaluation, about thrice greater than in early protection for Obama and roughly twice that of Bush and Clinton. Protection of Trump’s early time in workplace moved additional away from a deal with the coverage agenda and extra towards character and management,” mentioned Pew.
The report concerning the harsh media protection was included in Pew’s year-ending report titled “17 Placing Findings From 2017.”
Click on for extra from The Washington Examiner.