Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. had repeatedly been denied access to U.S. – National

0
24

Buy Organic Traffic | Cheap Organic Traffic | Increase Organic Traffic | Organic Traffic


Around the time Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya met with Donald Trump Jr. last year, she was drawing attention from U.S. government officials for her work with an investment firm attempting to weaken U.S. sanctions on Russia.

Officials tried to seize the attorney’s emails and at times denied her entry into the U.S., according to government and legal documents.


READ MORE:
Donald Trump Jr. emails: Key figures mentioned in the Russian email chain

The scrutiny focused on Veselnitskaya’s ties to Prevezon Holdings Ltd. and its owner, who is the son of a former Russian government official and a fierce advocate for rolling back some sanctions. Her work underscores the blurry intersection in Russia between business and government, which has deepened the questions about her and the June 2016 meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and other Trump associates.

At the time of the meeting, Veselnitskaya was helping defend Prevezon against charges that the company laundered proceeds from a $230 million Russian tax fraud scheme. The discovery of the tax fraud scheme allegedly played a role in the 2009 death of Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky and prompted U.S. lawmakers to enact a sanctions law in his name.

WATCH: Ex-soviet spy confirm he attended meeting with Trump Jr. at request of Russian lawyer





Veselnitskaya was also working with a group of lobbyists trying to weaken the Magnitsky Act — a $300,000 campaign partly financed by Denis Katsyv, Prevezon’s owner.

Trump Jr. has said Veselnitskaya spent much of their meeting discussing the Magnitsky Act and one of its repercussions — Russia blocking U.S. adoptions — despite the fact the sit-down was billed as an opportunity to discuss potentially incriminating information about Democrat Hillary Clinton. According to emails released by Trump Jr., he was told by an associate that the promised information was part of the Russian government’s efforts to help his father win the White House.


READ MORE:
Reality check: Did Donald Trump Jr. commit treason?

Veselnitskaya’s work history could become fodder for federal and congressional investigators probing whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia to meddle in the election. Veselnitskaya has denied having ties to the Kremlin, and Trump has denied any coordination with Moscow.

Rinat Ahkmetshin, a Russian-American lobbyist and former Soviet military official, described Veselnitskaya to The Associated Press as a “very emotional person and a great patriot of Russia.” He said he saw no evidence of any direct ties between her and the Russian government.

“She’s a hard-working person, very loyal to her clients,” said Ahkmetshin, who confirmed to AP on Friday that he, too, attended last year’s meeting at Trump Tower.

Akhmetshin said Veselnitskaya coordinated frequently with him and others last year in lobbying aimed at stripping Sergei Magnitsky’s name from the sanctions law. U.S. proponents of the law said the lobbying campaign was also directed at weakening or defeating a proposed expansion of the original measure that authorized the president to sanction individuals, companies or governments complicit in human rights violations and corruption.

That bill passed in December and was signed by President Barack Obama.

WATCH: White House defends Trump son’s meeting with Russian lawyer





As Veselnitskaya was both defending Prevezon and working for its owner’s anti-sanctions campaign, U.S. officials began scrutinizing her actions and communications.

Preet Bhahara, then the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, questioned Veselnitskaya for billing the government $2,000 for a two-day stay at New York’s lavish Plaza Hotel during depositions of several Prevezon defendants, including Katsyv.

“Ms. Veselnitskaya appears to have stayed at a less expensive hotel during the depositions, but moved to the Plaza after the depositions concluded, and only after the Court orally stated that the government would be responsible for reimbursing defendants’ expenses,” Bharara said in a letter to the trial judge. Bharara was ousted by the new administration in March.

Prosecutors also tried to use a grand jury subpoena to learn more about Veselnitskay’s communications with another Russian lawyer for Prevezon. Prosecutors said that lawyer, Andrey Pavlov, filed sham lawsuits against investors in Russian companies and associates with members of a Russian organized crime group described as “a shadowy criminal syndicate — identified only as ‘the Organization.’”


READ MORE:
Trump lawyer says Donald Trump Jr.’s Russia email chain did not break the law

The documents do not explain why prosecutors sought Veselnitskaya’s communications with Pavlov or detail whether any correspondence was turned over to federal authorities. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which prosecuted the case, declined to comment.

In a declaration she filed in the case in January 2016, Veselnitskaya complained she had “been harassed by the (U.S.) government” despite being given temporary permission to work in New York on the Prevezon case. She said she was detained at London’s Heathrow Airport on a return trip from the U.S. and “unjustifiably” subjected to a strip search based on a “parole number” she was given by American officials.

A federal prosecutor explained in a hearing that U.S. immigration officials had repeatedly denied her entry, but did not explain the reasons. The Justice Department finally allowed Veselnitskaya to temporarily perform legal work in the U.S. under “immigration parole,” a special visa requiring approval from the U.S. attorney general.


READ MORE:
Donald Trump Jr. should testify in Congress, Paul Ryan says

Trump used that visa clearance to defend his son’s meeting with Veselnitskaya, saying then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch had approved her entry to the U.S.

Veselnitskaya has cast her work in the U.S. last year as a success. In May, the Justice Department settled its case, with the company paying $6 million in fines but admitting no guilt.

Buy Website Traffic | Cheap Website Traffic | Increase Website Traffic | Website Traffic



Source link