Special ops shoot down Brennan and his defenders: ‘You put your politics before us’


Buy Organic Traffic | Cheap Organic Traffic | Increase Organic Traffic | Organic Traffic

John Brennan rallied quite a few high-powered defenders to his nook over his safety clearance conflict with President Trump, however some well-known particular ops heroes are firing again suggesting the previous CIA director received what he deserves.

Kris “Tanto” Paronto, a former Military Ranger and personal safety contractor who was a part of the CIA crew that fought again in the course of the 2012 Benghazi terror assault, accused Brennan of placing his “politics” earlier than these within the subject. 

“He’s fortunate the safety clearance is all he’s getting away with,” Paronto advised Fox Information in an interview on Friday. 

Responding a day earlier to Brennan’s tweet that his “ideas are price way over clearances,” Paronto additionally tweeted: 

“My ideas are higher than clearances too John, particularly if you and the @CIA kool-aid drinkers punishes us for not going together with the Benghazi cover-up story with a view to shield you, @HillaryClinton’s & @BarackObama’s failures. You place your politics earlier than us.” 

Paronto helped write the e-book “13 Hours,” later became a function movie, concerning the Benghazi assault. He has stated he and his crew misplaced their safety clearances for talking out. 

Safety operators together with Paronto beforehand needed to signal non-disclosure agreements — Paronto advised Fox Information he signed three pertaining to Benghazi inside a six-month interval — although Brennan advised lawmakers in 2014 this was not a particular effort to stop them from chatting with Congress. 

Paronto maintains, nevertheless, that he did not share categorized data in telling the Benghazi story and continues to object to their clearances being revoked. 

“Usually when you have got a clearance suspended, you’re purported to know why … I used to be by no means on condition that,” he stated, blaming Brennan. “It was his dedication whether or not we stored our clearances or not.” 

He additionally took exception at how the Benghazi crew was handled upon their return. 

“We come again from being on the bottom to be handled as a second class citizen. You come again and also you’re referred to as a liar,” Paronto advised Fox Information. “Brennan got here in and there was no speak of ‘hey, good job guys,’ not that you just search for it, however as a substitute, it was ‘don’t say something guys, we don’t need the reality to get out.’” 

Paronto continued his assault towards Brennan on Twitter Thursday evening, firing a spherical of accusations towards the previous CIA director.

In the meantime, quite a few leaders from the intelligence group defended Brennan, calling President Trump’s resolution to revoke his safety clearance “ill-considered and unprecedented.”


“The president’s motion concerning John Brennan and the threats of comparable motion towards different former officers has nothing to do with who ought to and shouldn’t maintain safety clearances—and all the pieces to do with an try and stifle free speech,” the letter from 12 former intelligence officers learn.

“As people who’ve cherished and helped protect the appropriate of People to free speech—even when that proper has been used to criticize us—that sign is inappropriate and deeply regrettable,” they wrote.

The group included six former CIA administrators, notably retired Military Gen. David H. Petraeus; former director of nationwide intelligence James Clapper, whose safety clearance can also be into consideration on the White Home; and 5 former deputy administrators of the CIA.

One other senior official, William McRaven, who was commander of U.S. Joint Particular Operations command from 2011 to 2014 and oversaw the Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan that killed Usama bin Laden, penned an op-ed for the Washington Put up Thursday, urging Trump to “revoke my safety clearance, too.”


McRaven referred to as Brennan “a person of unparalleled integrity,” and stated he would “contemplate it an honor” to have his safety clearance revoked and add his title to “the record of women and men who’ve spoken up towards your presidency.”

“In the event you assume for a second that your McCarthy-era techniques will suppress the voices of criticism, you’re sadly mistaken,” McRaven wrote. “The criticism will proceed till you turn into the chief we prayed you’d be.”

Robert O’Neill, the SEAL Workforce 6 member who killed Usama bin Laden, respectfully disagreed with McRaven.

 (Fox Information )

Robert O’Neill, the SEAL Workforce 6 member who killed bin Laden, respectfully disagreed with McRaven. 

“I’ve nothing however respect and love for ADM McRaven. Sure I’ve seen this. We merely disagree,” O’Neill tweeted with a hyperlink to McRaven’s op-ed.

However O’Neill reserved a Twitter burn for former Obama international coverage adviser Ben Rhodes, who touted the ex-CIA director’s involvement within the killing of the 9/11 mastermind in 2011.

“John Brennan was the purpose individual for the Obama White Home on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. He is aware of much more about defending our nation than somebody who makes use of safety clearances to punish his political adversaries,” Rhodes tweeted.

O’Neill responded: “Really, @brhodes, 23 conservatives went after UBL. No offense, in case you have been questioning.” 

Brooke Singman is a Politics Reporter for Fox Information. Comply with her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews.

Buy Website Traffic | Cheap Website Traffic | Increase Website Traffic | Website Traffic

Source link