Mr. Dourson notified the White Home late on Wednesday of his choice to withdraw his title, in keeping with a Senate aide, including that Mr. Dourson wouldn’t stay on the company.
The choice was welcomed by environmental and public well being advocates.
“It’s superb information that Michael Dourson received’t be deciding which chemical compounds are and aren’t protected for our children,” mentioned Richard Denison, lead senior scientist for the Environmental Protection Fund, an advocacy group. “He was a very poisonous alternative for the job, together with his lengthy report of mercenary science. His presence would even have undermined implementation of the historic chemical security reforms handed by Congress final 12 months.”
Mr. Dourson declined to answer a request for remark despatched to the company’s public affairs workplace.
His withdrawal adopted the discharge of a number of lots of of pages of his correspondence with chemical trade officers whereas he was being thought of for the E.P.A. job. The New York Occasions obtained the emails from Greenpeace, which acquired them in response to a Freedom of Data request to the College of Cincinnati. A lawyer for the college confirmed their provenance.
The emails element an unusually shut relationship with the American Chemistry Council and with particular person firms whose merchandise are scheduled for precedence evaluation by the E.P.A., amongst them trichloroethylene, generally known as TCE, a risky natural compound extensively utilized in industrial and industrial processes, and flame retardants. The E.P.A., citing the numerous well being hazards of the chemical TCE, which is extensively used as a degreasing agent and a spot cleaner on clothes, had proposing banning it. If he led the division, Mr. Dourson would have needed to finalize that plan, despite the fact that he had not too long ago dealt with work for the trade defending the industrial use of the identical substance.
The paperwork additionally present that Mr. Dourson’s middle on the college, which accepted cash from the commerce group and different firms for analysis, despatched a draft paper based mostly on that analysis to the trade council to edit earlier than submitting it to a journal for publication — thought of by most to be an unacceptable observe in academia.
“There’s a battle of curiosity if trade legal professionals are vetting papers,” mentioned Arthur Caplan, a professor of bioethics at New York College’s Langone Medical Heart. “All in all, an trade commerce group position in writing a paper is a mountain of battle of curiosity.”
Mr. Dourson didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the emails.
Proceed studying the principle story