Big modifications are afoot for the gig economy. California’s Senate passed a landmark expense on Tuesday night that might make Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Postmates and other gig economy business. Gov. Gavin Newsom has actually stated he’ll sign it into law.
The potential expense, AB 5, has the possible to overthrow gig economy business, which have companies that depend upon bringing aboard numerous countless independent professionals whose labor is far more affordable than that of workers. The setup advantages business by moving numerous expenses to the employees. For example, Uber and Lyft motorists supply and keep their own automobiles and likewise spend for their own healthcare. The motorists likewise aren’t provided advantages, such as ill days or overtime pay.
Uber and Lyft have both stated their companies might be broken if they’re needed to reclassify their motorists as workers. The relocation would bring a brand-new set of expenses to the business, both of which are having a hard time to end up being rewarding. Uber hadin the previous 6 weeks to manage its costs.
When Uber filed to become a publicly traded company, it specifically identified the risk in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. “Our business would be adversely affected if drivers were classified as employees instead of independent contractors,” it wrote.
What happens in California rarely stays there. By dint of its size, the Golden State often sets legal and regulatory standards for the country. The state is the largest by both population and economic activity, and that size means companies around the world have to meet its often-strict and precedent-setting standards if they want to tap the lucrative market.
In addition to AB 5, the state passed the California Consumer Privacy Act, which sets standards for collecting information online and goes into effect in January. The state’s rules and laws on fuel efficiency, emissions and air quality have affected automakers around the world. And the California Assembly just passed a bill that would allow college athletes to be paid for the use of their likeness.
San Francisco and Oakland passed the earliest laws in the US curbing the use of facial recognition technology, and San Francisco was among the first cities to curb, requiring hosts to be registered with the city.
AB 5 could serve as a first step to broader oversight of the gig economy. Already New York City ensures drivers earn at least $17.22 per hour and has put limits on fleet sizes to prevent congestion. Washington state and Oregon have considered legislation similar to AB 5.
“While limited workers to California, other states are likely to enact similar legislation,” said Michael Droke, a labor and employment partner at Dorsey & Whitney.
While it’s clear Uber is going to have a lot on its hands with AB 5, the company’s chief legal officer, Tony West, didn’t seem too concerned during a call with reporters on Wednesday.
“This business is incredibly adaptable, and has withstood enormous, enormous challenges to both its business model as well as other things, and it has always come through those stronger and more responsive,” West said. “I do feel confident that we are going to be able to manage through this just as we have been able to manage through significant challenges in the past.”
Once signed by Newsom, AB 5 will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2020. All companies using independent contractors in the state will be put to a three-part test that looks at how much control the company has over its workers. The test looks at things like whether the company has workers wear uniforms, use its equipment and follow its business mandates.
West said Uber will likely pass the test and therefore won’t immediately reclassify its workers.
“Under that three-part test, arguably the highest bar is that a company must prove that contractors are doing work ‘outside the usual course’ of its business,” West said. “Just because the test is hard doesn’t mean that we will not be able to pass it.”
“Because we continue to believe drivers are properly classified as independent… drivers will not be automatically reclassified as employees, even after January of next year,” he added.
Not everyone is convinced. Justin Ho, the CEO of rideOS and former head of strategy for Uber’s self-driving and mapping units, said ride-hailing companies should look for options that don’t rely on inexpensive labor. One way, he said, is to make the technology more efficient.
“Increased driver wages do not have to result in higher prices for the consumers if there are continued optimizations in dispatch and routing technology,” he said.
Support for AB 5 was evident among ride-hail drivers in California. Thousands of drivers across the state rallied to whip up support for AB 5 as it made its way through the legislature. Theyand . Many .
“AB 5 is only the beginning,” said Edan Alva, a ride-hail driver who organized with the group Gig Workers Rising. He said the momentum for change is building. “Just because someone really needs to work does not mean that their rights as a worker should be stepped all over.”
Uber and Lyft have said the majority of their drivers don’t want to be employees. Both companies have repeatedly warned that if drivers are required to become employees, they’d lose their flexible work schedules.
Adam Roston, the CEO of Bluecrew, an on-demand staffing platform, said companies can still allow flexible work hours even if the bill is signed into law.
“It’s a false narrative that the flexibility of gig work and worker protections can’t coexist,” Roston said. “Nothing about this new law prevents workers from having the same flexibility they have today.”
Still, both Uber and Lyft appear to be doing whatever it takes to keep their drivers independent contractors. The companies have said that if they couldn’t strike a deal on AB 5, they’dby sponsoring a ballot initiative in November 2020 that would exempt them from the law. Along with DoorDash, Uber and Lyft have already transferred $30 million each into a campaign committee account to sponsor the initiative.
“Our state’s political leadership missed an important opportunity to support the overwhelming majority of rideshare drivers,” Adrian Durbin, a Lyft spokesman, wrote in an emailed statement. “We are fully prepared to take this issue to the voters of California to preserve the freedom and access drivers and riders want and need.”
Originally published Sept. 11.
Update, 2:07 p.m.: Adds comment from attorney Michael Droke. Update, 3:11 p.m.: Adds comments from Tony West, Uber’s chief legal officer. Update, 4:51 p.m.: Adds comments from Justin Ho, CEO of rideOS, and Adam Roston, CEO of Bluecrew.