The Trump administration took a serious step on Thursday to limit asylum claims by migrants, placing ahead a regulation that may make people ineligible for asylum in the event that they cross the U.S. southern border illegally.
As soon as the plan goes into full impact, which is anticipated to occur in coming days, migrants getting into on the U.S. southern border would solely be eligible for asylum if they arrive to official ports of entry.
WATCH: If a caravan of asylum seekers was heading to Canada, Trudeau would alert Mounties: Lewandowski
“What we try to do is making an attempt to funnel … asylum claims by means of the ports of entry the place we’re higher resourced, have higher capabilities and higher manpower and staffing to really deal with these claims in an expeditious and environment friendly method,” a senior administration official advised reporters in a information briefing on Thursday, on situation of anonymity.
The plan is the Trump administration’s newest transfer to restrict the eligibility of migrants for asylum in the US.
The regulation would largely have an effect on migrants from Central America’s Northern Triangle – Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador – who cross the U.S. border with Mexico to flee violence and poverty of their residence international locations.
“The overwhelming majority of aliens who enter illegally in the present day come from the Northern Triangle international locations, and huge parts of these aliens assert a reputable concern,” the regulation’s textual content says. “Channeling these aliens to ports of entry would encourage these aliens to first avail themselves of provides of asylum from Mexico.”
WATCH: Protection Division outlines response to potential asylum claims from migrant caravan
Immigrant advocates shortly denounced the administration’s transfer.
“U.S. regulation particularly permits people to use for asylum whether or not or not they’re at a port of entry,” mentioned Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Challenge. “It’s unlawful to avoid that by company or presidential decree.”