Amazon’s Rekognition incorrectly matched legislators to lawbreakers… once again, ACLU states

0
436
facial-recognition-face-id-password-6

Revealed: The Secrets our Clients Used to Earn $3 Billion

The ACLU and Amazon butted heads Tuesday over facial acknowledgment innovation. 


James Martin/CNET

The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California states facial acknowledgment innovation isn’t all set to be utilized for police. This follows a test of Amazon’s Rekognition software application incorrectly flagged 26 California legislators as lawbreakers, according to the ACLU. 

The ACLU tweeted about the test on Tuesday, stating the software application matched 1 in 5 legislators to the mugshot of somebody who had actually been detained. The test compared lawmakers’ images with a database of 25,000 openly offered mugshots. The ACLU of Northern California likewise launched a picture of all the legislators it states the Rekognition system incorrectly flagged at lawbreakers. 

The ACLU image consists of the text: “Yes on AB 1215. One false match is too many.” AB 1215 is a state costs that intends to prohibit facial acknowledgment software application from being utilized on cops body cams. It was authored by Democratic Assemblyman Phil Ting, who was amongst the legislators incorrectly matched by Amazon’s system in the ACLU test.

“Imagine the real world implications,” Ting tweeted on Monday.

aclu

ACLU

Amazon, nevertheless, states the ACLU is intentionally misrepresenting its innovation.

“As we’ve said many times in the past, when used with the recommended 99% confidence threshold and as one part of a human-driven decision, facial recognition technology can be used for a long list of beneficial purposes, from assisting in the identification of criminals to helping find missing children to inhibiting human trafficking,” an Amazon representative stated in an emailed declaration.

A self-confidence rating, according to Amazon, is a number in between 0 and 100 that suggests the likelihood that an offered forecast is right.

The ACLU states Amazon is intentionally misguiding the general public about its facial acknowledgment software application.

“Amazon knows — with 100% certainty — that its law enforcement customers are using lower confidence scores or no score at all when using the company’s system,” Matt Cagle, innovation and civil liberties lawyer at the ACLU of Northern California, stated in an e-mail Wednesday. 

The Washington County Sheriff Office in Oregon is the only police entity presently noted as an Amazon Rekognition client, according to the business’s site. The Washington County Sheriff’s Office didn’t right away react to ask for remark. 

Last year, the ACLU implicated Amazon of the exact same personal privacy synthetic pas after comparing 25,000 criminal mugshots to members of Congress. The tool idea 28 various members of Congress appeared like individuals who have actually been detained. Afterwards, it emerged that the ACLU got its mugshot matches by utilizing the Rekognition software application at its default 80% self-confidence limit setting. In other words, the software application might have returned matches that it was 80% positive were right. Amazon suggested a 95% plus self-confidence level for police. 

359562c


Now playing:
Watch this:

Backlash grows for police use of facial recognition (The…



5:11