Shamima Begum to discover today if she is enabled back to the UK

Shamima Begum will discover today whether she has actually won an appeal versus the choice to eliminate her British citizenship.

In 2015, she and 2 other east London schoolgirls took a trip to Syria to sign up with the so-called Islamic State (IS).

Her British citizenship was withdrawed on nationwide security premises by then-home secretary Sajid Javid quickly after she was discovered, 9 months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February 2019.

She has actually been secured a legal fight with the Government since.

Most just recently, she and her group have actually challenged the Home Office at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in an appeal procedure.

Mr Justice Jay is now due to offer the choice later on today.

Ms Begum ‘clearly represents a threat’, according to one Government minister interviewed today.

Veterans’ affairs minister Johnny Mercer, inquired about whether the 23- year-old ought to be enabled to go back to the UK, informed GB News: ‘That’ s a choice for the Home Secretary and previous house secretaries.

‘Certainly, Sajid Javid when he was home secretary made the decision to revoke her citizenship. That’ s a choice for them.

‘Of course she plainly represents a danger. But there is a great deal of info because case that is not in the general public domain.

‘I don’ t believe it deserves discussing it in public. I believe those choices are made in the courts and in the Home Office, and I make sure they’ll pertain to the best conclusion.’

During a five-day hearing in November, Ms Begum’s legal representatives stated that the Home Office had a responsibility to examine whether she was a victim of trafficking prior to removing her of her British citizenship.

The expert tribunal heard stated that she was ‘recruited, transported, transferred, harboured and received in Syria for the purposes of ‘sexual exploitation’ and “marriage” to a man’.

At a previous hearing in February 2020, SIAC ruled that the choice to eliminate her British citizenship was legal as Ms Begum was ‘a citizen of Bangladesh by descent’ at the time of the choice.

However, her lawyers stated in November that the choice made her ‘de facto stateless’, where she had no useful right to citizenship in Bangladesh, with Bangladeshi authorities mentioning they would not enable her into the nation.

Barristers for the Home Office protected the Government’s choice, arguing that individuals trafficked to Syria and persuaded can still be dangers to nationwide security, including that Ms Begum revealed no regret when she at first emerged from IS-controlled area.

Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, stated there was ‘no “credible suspicion” that she was a victim of trafficking or was at genuine and instant threat of being trafficked prior to her travel from the UK’.

Sir James stated that the then-home secretary Mr Javid considered Ms Begum’s age, how she took a trip to Syria– consisting of most likely online radicalisation– and her activity in Syria when deciding to eliminate her British citizenship.

He included that the Security Services ‘continue to assess that Ms Begum poses a risk to national security’.

The judgment is because of be bied far at 10 am.

Get in touch with our news group by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, inspect our news page