Firefighters keep an eye on a back fire as they fight the Mendocino Complex fire previously this month near Lodoga,California
Justin Sullivan/GettyImages
Verizon Wireless states a customer support mistake– not an offense of net neutrality– was accountable for the ongoing throttling of the cordless information service of a fire department car throughout a current fight of a California wildfire.
But that hasn’t stopped net neutrality advocates from pointing at the event as an example of the sort of possible treatment that web and cordless provider can provide now that the guidelines for governing an open web are removed away.
The problem turned up on Monday after the Santa Clara Fire Department stated in a court filing that while it was assisting combat the Mendocino Complex fire– the biggest wildfire in the state’s history– the team appointed to among the department’s trucks saw its service significantly hampered.
“County Fire has experienced throttling by its ISP, Verizon,” Santa Clara County Fire Chief Anthony Bowden composed in the filing, reported on earlier by ArsTechnica “This throttling has had a significant impact on our ability to provide emergency services. Verizon imposed these limitations despite being informed that throttling was actively impeding County Fire’s ability to provide crisis-response and essential emergency services.”
While Verizon firmly insists that this error had absolutely nothing to do with net neutrality, the event has actually been connected to the problem. During a Wednesday conversation by a California state assembly committee of a proposed net neutrality expense, among the assemblymen raised the Verizon problem as an issue and one reason that he supported more powerful policies. The firemen event has actually stimulated a great deal of anger at Verizon, that makes it simple to connect the problem with the mentally charged dispute over net neutrality.
Ultimately, this isn’t a net neutrality problem. This event handled firemens surpassing their limitation of information, while net neutrality handle how various type of traffic or material is dealt with. Verizon wasn’t playing favorites when it concerned the information that the firemens got. It– incorrectly, by its own admission– decreased the connection due to the fact that of the volume of information, not the particular type. Those subtleties often get lost in the heated argument over net neutrality.
The fire department spent for a limitless strategy from Verizon however suffered heavy throttling till it accepted pay more for another strategy, according to an addendum to a legal quick submitted by 22 state attorney generals of the United States that looks for to reverse the rollback of net neutrality guidelines previously this year by the FCC.
“The Internet has become an essential tool in providing fire and emergency response, particularly for events like large fires which require the rapid deployment and organization of thousands of personnel and hundreds of fire engines, aircraft, and bulldozers,” Bowden composed.
< div class ="shortcode video v2" data-video-playlist="[{" id="" is="" net="" neutrality="" godzilla="" helps="" explain="" bridget="" carey="" toys="" around="" with="" a="" simple="" explanation="" of="" neutrality.="" features="">
Watch this:
What is Net neutrality? Godzilla helps explain
1:36
The throttling affected “OES 5262,” a command and control vehicle that helps track and deploy firefighter resources around the state and country where there’s the greatest need, Bowden said.
“In the midst of our response to the Mendocino Complex Fire, County Fire discovered the data connection for OES 5262 was being throttled by Verizon, and data rates had been reduced to 1/200, or less, than the previous speeds,” Bowden wrote. “These reduced speeds severely interfered with the OES 5262’s ability to function effectively.”
Bowden said his staff communicated with Verizon about the throttling but was told by representatives for the wireless carrier the throttling would continue until the unit switched to a new data plan that cost twice the previous plan.
In a statement Tuesday, Verizon acknowledged it erred in continuing to throttle the unit’s data service after the department requested restrictions be lifted, calling it a miscommunication unrelated to net neutrality. Verizon said in a statement:
Like all customers, fire departments choose service plans that are best for them. This customer purchased a government contract plan for a high-speed wireless data allotment at a set monthly cost. Under this plan, users get an unlimited amount of data but speeds are reduced when they exceed their allotment until the next billing cycle. Regardless of the plan emergency responders choose, we have a practice to remove data speed restrictions when contacted in emergency situations. We have done that many times, including for emergency personnel responding to these tragic fires. In this situation, we should have lifted the speed restriction when our customer reached out to us. This was a customer support mistake. We are reviewing the situation and will fix any issues going forward.
Late Monday, attorneys general of 22 states and the District of Columbia filed a brief urging a US Appeals Court to reverse the Federal Communications Commission’s rollback of Obama-era rules governing an open internet. The wave of support underscores the notion that while the net neutrality rules are gone, the push to bring them back isn’t. On Wednesday, that California committee opted to push forward that state net neutrality bill over the objections of companies such as Verizon, AT&T and Comcast.Â
The story originally published on Aug. 21 at 9:44 p.m. PT.Â
Update, Aug. 23 at 9:25 a.m. PT: To include additional details and discussion over net neutrality.
Net neutrality supporters take protest to Verizon stores
See all photos
Cambridge Analytica: Everything you need to know about Facebook’s data mining scandal.
iHate: CNET looks at how intolerance is taking over the internet.
