California Supreme Court guidelines Yelp can’t be bought to eliminate bad evaluations

0
342
35426712_SS31.jpg

Revealed: The Secrets our Clients Used to Earn $3 Billion

Yelp does not need to eliminate unfavorable evaluations, California Supreme Court guidelines.


Josh Miller/ CNET.

Yelp does not need to eliminate unfavorable remarks published on its website, after all.

In the carefully enjoyed case of Hassell v Bird, the Supreme Court of California on Monday ruled 4-3 that Yelp can’t be bought to remove unfavorable remarks, the Associated Press reported.

That choice reversed 2 lower court judgments that bought Yelp to eliminate”defamatory” examines published by lawyer Dawn Hassell’s previous customer, AvaBird

Yelp challenged that judgment, stating Hassell stopped working to show Bird’s remarks were really defamatory, that it could not be held accountable for speech published on its platform which the business– which wasn’t a celebration in the claim– could not be required to comply.

California’s Supreme Court concurred.

“In directing Yelp to remove the challenged reviews from its website, the removal order improperly treats Yelp as ‘the publisher or speaker of … information provided by another information content provider,'” the court composed in its judgment (published listed below).

“With this decision, online publishers in California can be assured that they cannot be lawfully forced to remove third-party speech through enterprising abuses of the legal system, and those of us that use such platforms to express ourselves cannot be easily silenced through such tactics either,” Aaron Schur, Yelp’s deputy basic counsel, composed on the business’s main blog site.

The choice is a relief for numerous in Silicon Valley, which saw the lower courts’ choices as an attack on the FirstAmendment “Neither court seemed to understand that the First Amendment protects not only authors and speakers, but also those who publish or distribute their words,” digital rights supporter Electric Frontier Foundation composed in 2015.

Monday’s judgment might not mark an end to the courtroom procedures, nevertheless. “Hassell is considering all legal options, including review by the U.S. Supreme Court,” her lawyer, Monique Oliver, stated in an emailed declaration.

Follow the Money: This is how digital money is altering the method we conserve, store and work.

CNET Magazine: Check out a sample of the stories in CNET’s newsstand edition.