American and Chinese Scientists Leading Efforts on COVID-19
Despite the political stress in between the United States and China, researchers in the 2 nations are interacting more than ever to study the COVID-19 infection, a brand-new research study recommends.
Researchers evaluated the clinical documents that scientists all over the world produced on coronaviruses prior to and after the arrival of COVID-19. They discovered that the United States and China were world leaders in the subject location prior to COVID-19 and they stay so now.
“The collaborations between U.S. and Chinese scientists have intensified to the exclusion of most other countries, except the U.K.” stated Caroline Wagner, co-author of the research study and associate teacher in the John Glenn College of Public Affairs at The Ohio State University.
“There may be friction between the U.S. and China on the political level, but at the scientific level we see something different — a lot of collaboration.”
The research study was released on July 21, 2020, in PLOS ONE.
Wagner and her coworkers evaluated a database of clinical posts on coronavirus-related research study in between Jan. 1, 2018, and Jan. 1, 2020. They compared that with a comparable database of research study from January 1 to April 23, 2020.
They analyzed the nation where the authors of each research study were based to see if there were distinctions in the pre- and post-COVID-19 durations.
One crucial finding was how rapidly China increase its coronavirus research study after COVID-19 was initially recognized in Wuhan, China, late in 2019, Wagner stated.
“Chinese researchers produced more scientific articles on coronavirus in the first four months of 2020 — more than 1,600 articles — than in the previous 24 months combined,” she stated.
Chinese documents on coronavirus tended to be released in higher-impact journals after the crisis than previously — one sign of better-quality research study.
The research study likewise discovered that China has actually ended up being the world leader in financing coronavirus research study given that COVID-19 was found. Before COVID-19, the U.S. National Institutes of Health was the leading funder of coronavirus-related research study. But ever since, Chinese governmental companies are most likely than the NIH to be acknowledged as the financing source in released research studies.
Even prior to COVID-19, China and the United States were at the center of the worldwide network of coronavirus research study, although researchers from numerous nations likewise took part, findings revealed. But research study on coronaviruses today is driven by smaller sized groups with scientists from less nations. Scientists from China, the United States, and the U.K. control worldwide groups.
“The network has shifted. With the urgency of the crisis, it makes sense that researchers are looking for smaller teams that can speed up the research process,” Wagner stated.
In different research study released in December, Wagner and coworkers discovered that a growing variety of Chinese researchers operating in the United States were going back to their homeland. That has actually most likely affected coronavirus research study, according to Wagner.
“Now, many of those Chinese scientists who went back home may be working with their former colleagues in the United States on coronavirus studies, among many other topics,” she stated.
While the close connections in between U.S. and Chinese researchers might benefit accelerating research study, it includes an expense.
“There is a vulnerability for scientists in other countries who are no longer part of these research networks,” she stated. “It is good to have researchers from all over the world working on a crisis like this.”
###
Reference: “Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research” by Caroline V. Fry, Xiaojing Cai, Yi Zhang and Caroline S. Wagner, 21 July 2020, PLOS ONE.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236307
Co-authors on the research study were Caroline Fry of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Yi Zhang of the University of Technology Sydney in Australia; and Xiaojing Cai, a going to fellow at Ohio State from Zhejiang University in China.
